The MATH

The math... the math has always been used in a way that substantiates what the physicist measures and then what is measured can be operated upon with the mathematics at hand. This in turn allows predictions from variables.

This hypothesis however, is not so much about the math but is more about the logic of math's functions at unmeasureable dimensions and proportions. Even then, this hypothesis is primarily about structure rather than the mathematical values of the individual components.

In fact, the whole idea behind this project is about STRUCTURE. Any two or more IDENTICAL objects may be joined in many shapes of design and usefulness.

While the substance of each piece is uniform, the final product will always be a product of its unique structure.

My greatest hurdle in this project was keeping an open mind about what I perceived the numbers to mean. The most difficult had to do with the speed of light.

The perception that light speed meant a fixed velocity in the vacuum of space was fairly engrained as an absolute value of linear velocity.

But then there was the fixed velocity of the spin of each "electromagnetic field". Nothing linear about those things. My experience with electronics soon had me wondering about the relationships between the rate of spin or frequency of various field diameters that encircle current carrying wires.

If light speed were to be constant, then the inner field spin frequencies would have to be higher. Then came the explanation of light speed relativity. Time stops at the speed of light and so, no matter what the diameter i.e. circumference is, the field is always a motionless field of magnetic force. (Unless acted upon by another field of force in motion.)

Digging deeper, whether in attraction or repulsion, the combined force continues until the existing condition ceases. The explanation? Electron motion within the atom creates the force as it orbits and spins through space.

The formulas were written, the processes were established and both the math and the measurements worked with one always substantiating the other.

A proven hypothesis. Now a tested theory. All magnetism is electromagnetism. Okay, but what is the structure of the electron that is credited with this inexhaustible force? And how does the electron do that?

The two formulas that top this page were written years ago. Brilliantly for the same reason yet almost insanely different in their approach.

It is the difference that begs an explaination. My idea of that difference has to do with the possible misperception of structure for these two different mathematical solutions.

After a couple of years of contemplated possibilities, I began to focus on Max Planck's string theory and the highly debated structure of it's theorized dimension.

It seems to have been theorized that as many as twelve dimensions were involved in its structure. Good luck visualizing that. Nevertheless the numbers (the math) had to be rationally explained.

Could the math explain the structure? If so the structure might explain the math and that was a good starting place.

Reading about Planck's process for the development of his E=hf was a great part of the logic behind this project.

Basically, his constant, h was formulated as the smallest possible amplitude of any frequency and so Energy could be calculated by knowing the multiples of his constant in terms of the involved frequency.

Perhaps that frequency was seen only as a wave shape when the more logical perception might have been the image of spin, as in a magnetic field.

What math have I presented? None of my own and only my perception of what has already been established. What good would it do to add formulas that equate the same results? If Planck and Einstein didn't get it right, who am I to say so?

The fact that I believe they were both correct left only perception or visualization of the two different approaches to solve for the same thing --- Energy.

Could they both be using the same common denominator of different perception? Could the only difference be size and structure? Since magnetic fields come in all sizes as motionless fields of force, motionless by relativity of light speed, an avenue of contemplation became apparent to me.

And so the subject of this hypothesis began. Potential Energy originating in magnetism and Kinetic Energy and Matter originating in magnetic structure.

Possibly a beautiful answer to "What is our Universe?"

Does this or does this not say that Energy is Space/Time Big Units in Terms of Mass and that Energy is Space/Time Small Units in Terms of Frequency?

If so wouldn't that be to say that Energy might be Kinetic in terms of Potential - - - A possibility only if Energy as Magnetism preceeded Matter as Mass?

If true, Larger Units as Mass might be the sum or product of Smaller Units as Magnetism. This would allow structure of the Universe from just magnetism.

Index

Home